EU Democracy and E-Democracy: Can the Two Be Reconciled?
نویسنده
چکیده
For many observers neither EU-democracy nor e-democracy exist in any meaningful sense. With regard to the latter this is certainly the case, though this does not mean that we are not witnessing innovative experimentation with information and communication technologies (ICT) in the democratic realm. This chapter focuses on the prospects for e-democratic experimentation in the EU political setting. Drawing on normative democratic theory we look at four dimensions of e-democratic innovation: ICT techniques aimed at improving mechanisms of (1) representation, (2) participation and (3) deliberation and (4) opening new channels of contestation. The aim of the chapter is to survey some recent edemocratic innovations within the framework of these four broader normative visions and, in doing so, investigate the potential impact of ICT driven innovation on EU democratisation. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30068-4_9 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-111568 Originally published at: Mendez, Fernando (2013). EU democracy and e-democracy: can the two be reconciled? In: Demetriou, Kyriakos N. Democracy in Transition : Political Participation in the European Union. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 161-178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30068-4_9 EU Democracy and E-Democracy: Can the Two Be Reconciled?
منابع مشابه
How is Democracy Applied within the EU: Combining Elements of Traditional and Innovative Democratic Practice
The EU represents a new and complex political system which, according to numerous social scholars, suffers from the so-called democratic deficit. The basic argument behind this claim is that citizens lack control of the EU because, within its political system, national parliaments of member states possess only limited powers which have not been adequately compensated through steady empowerment ...
متن کاملQuantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of the Concepts of Republic and Democracy in Imam Khomeini's Political Thought
Repu: blic and democracy are two terms applied to mean ruling of people since fifth century B.C. They have been especially and tremendously emphasized in west since 16th century. To clarify his ruling system prior and subsequent to the victory of revolution, Imam Khomeini applied these terms as well. What republic and democracy quantitatively and qualitatively mean in Imam Khomeini's political ...
متن کاملDemocracy through technocracy? Reflections on technocratic assumptions in EU democracy promotion discourse
For some time the notion ‘technocracy’ has been, for better or for worse, associated with the functioning of the European Union (EU). But what role do technocratic assumptions play in the EU’s new ‘symbolic’ policy agenda of democracy promotion, if any? Some authors have suggested that ‘depoliticising’ technocratic biases exist in the EU democracy promotion framework, despite its ‘normative’ rh...
متن کاملAnalysis and Criticism of Epistemological Approach to Democracy and Impossibility of Religious Democracy
In this article the author clarifies his epistemological approach to democracy based on its two crucial principles namely autonomy and dialogue. He has demonstrated that distinguished scholars of this approach deny the integration of religion and democracy and believe in the impossibility of religious democracy. Given this theory, the author has criticized humanological and epistemological foun...
متن کاملآیا دموکراسی برای کشورهای در حال توسعه خوب است؟
In recent years, some intellectuals have stated that democracy is not suitable for developing countries as it decreases their economic growth. They hold that dictatorship states can better plan for the benefit of their nations because they are free from the pressure of voters. This article explains two reasons to reject the mentioned claim. First, the definition of development has undergone cha...
متن کامل